In a recent New York Times Article, Hall (2007) provides a succinct and interesting account of the body of formal knowledge surrounding Wisdom.
He believes, like Merriam, Caffarella & Baumgartner (2007), that Erickson popularized the study of Wisdom from an adult learning perspective opening the door to broad, far reaching discussions concerning age as it relates to Wisdom. Unfortunately, the question continues to rage about the precise definition of Wisdom and whether age entitles you to Wisdom, or whether age is merely one component necessary to possessing Wisdom.
In presenting the case for determining whether Wisdom is the hallmark of adult learning, Merriam et al. (2007) fail to tie in the role of cognitive development in obtaining Wisdom. In fact they state that “…although it has been discussed over the ages by the great philosophers and the theologians, this area of study has received little attention in the literature on cognitive development and learning in general” (p. 358).
